diff --git a/docs/en/docs/contributing.md b/docs/en/docs/contributing.md
index be4706f74..f18372c12 100644
--- a/docs/en/docs/contributing.md
+++ b/docs/en/docs/contributing.md
@@ -219,3 +219,41 @@ Once there are several people in the discussion, the FastAPI team can evaluate i
 Then the docs will be automatically translated using LLMs, and the team of native speakers can review the translation, and help tweak the LLM prompts.
 
 Once there's a new translation, for example if docs are updated or there's a new section, there will be a comment in the same discussion with the link to the new translation to review.
+
+## Automated Code and AI
+
+You are encouraged to use all the tools you want to do your work and contribute as efficiently as possible, this includes AI (LLM) tools, etc. Nevertheless, contributions should have meaningful human intervention, judgement, context, etc.
+
+If the **human effort** put in a PR, e.g. writing LLM prompts, is **less** than the **effort we would need to put** to **review it**, please **don't** submit the PR.
+
+At most, share the LLM prompt or tool you would use to generate the PR, but don't submit it.
+
+Think of it this way: we can already write LLM prompts or run automated tools ourselves.
+
+If the problem can be solved by an LLM with a simple prompt, we can write the prompt.
+
+Doing it ourselves this way we only have to review the output of the LLM, knowing it's shortcomings and caveats. And knowing it's the pure output of the LLM, without any potential human tampering.
+
+So, it's more efficient for us to write LLM prompts ourselves than to review PRs generated with a simple LLM prompt or other forms of automated tools.
+
+### Closing Automated and AI PRs
+
+If we see PRs that seem AI generated, we'll flag them and close them.
+
+The same applies to comments and descriptions, please don't copy paste the content generated by an LLM.
+
+### Human Effort Denial of Service
+
+Using automated tools and AI to submit PRs or comments that we have to carefully review and handle would be the equivalent of a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack" class="external-link" target="_blank">Denial-of-service attack</a> on our human effort.
+
+You, and potentially many others, would be doing very little effort (an LLM prompt) that generates a large amount of effort on our side (carefully reviewing code).
+
+Please don't do that.
+
+We'll need to block accounts that spam us with repeated automated PRs or comments.
+
+### With Great Tools Comes Great Responsibility
+
+You have amazing tools at hand, use them wisely to help effectively.
+
+Avoid inadvertently doing harm. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Ben" class="external-link" target="_blank">Uncle Ben</a> would be very sad.
diff --git a/docs/en/docs/management-tasks.md b/docs/en/docs/management-tasks.md
index 6f34afb73..fc6e1eb28 100644
--- a/docs/en/docs/management-tasks.md
+++ b/docs/en/docs/management-tasks.md
@@ -122,6 +122,8 @@ For these language translation PRs, confirm that:
 
 * If a PR seems to be spam, meaningless, only to change statistics (to appear as "contributor") or similar, you can simply mark it as `invalid`, and it will be automatically closed.
 
+* If a PR seems to be AI generated, and seems like reviewing it would take more time from you than the time it took to write the prompt, mark it as `maybe-ai`, and it will be automatically closed.
+
 * A PR should have a specific use case that it is solving.
 
 * If the PR is for a feature, it should have docs.